Advertisement
www.space.com/scienceastr...l-waves.html
>"Lack of Gravity Waves Puts Limits on Exotic Cosmology Theories
By Clara Moskowitz
Staff Writer
posted: 19 August 2009
02:36 pm ET
This time, scientists are excited to find nothing.
In results announced today, a huge physics experiment built to detect gravitational waves has yet to find any.
Rather than be disappointed by the null findings, physicists say the results were expected, and in fact help them narrow down possibilities for what the universe was like just after it was born.
The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory Scientific Collaboration (LIGO) is a set of instruments in Louisiana and Washington built to search for evidence of gravitational waves, which are theoretical ripples in space-time thought to be caused by the acceleration of mass. No one has yet directly detected these waves, though they are predicted by Einstein's theory of General Relativity, and are widely thought to permeate our universe.
In theory, every time mass accelerates - even when you rise up out of your chair - the curvature of space-time changes, and ripples are produced. However, the gravitational waves produced by one person are so small as to be negligible. The waves produced by large masses, though, such as the collision of two black holes or a large supernova explosion, could be large enough to be detected."<
>"Lack of Gravity Waves Puts Limits on Exotic Cosmology Theories
By Clara Moskowitz
Staff Writer
posted: 19 August 2009
02:36 pm ET
This time, scientists are excited to find nothing.
In results announced today, a huge physics experiment built to detect gravitational waves has yet to find any.
Rather than be disappointed by the null findings, physicists say the results were expected, and in fact help them narrow down possibilities for what the universe was like just after it was born.
The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory Scientific Collaboration (LIGO) is a set of instruments in Louisiana and Washington built to search for evidence of gravitational waves, which are theoretical ripples in space-time thought to be caused by the acceleration of mass. No one has yet directly detected these waves, though they are predicted by Einstein's theory of General Relativity, and are widely thought to permeate our universe.
In theory, every time mass accelerates - even when you rise up out of your chair - the curvature of space-time changes, and ripples are produced. However, the gravitational waves produced by one person are so small as to be negligible. The waves produced by large masses, though, such as the collision of two black holes or a large supernova explosion, could be large enough to be detected."<
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Lack of Gravity Waves
Tue, September 1, 2009 - 9:48 AMWell, I'm a little disappointed. -
-
Re: Lack of Gravity Waves
Tue, September 1, 2009 - 8:46 PMThere is a lot going on, or not, that we do not know.
Somewhere we are going to have to change out thinking about gravity and QM to get them to dance. -
-
Re: Lack of Gravity Waves
Wed, September 2, 2009 - 5:25 PMTrue enough, I suspect we don't have sensitive enough equipment in the right place and time to know for certain currently? -
-
Re: Lack of Gravity Waves
Wed, September 2, 2009 - 5:48 PMThe biggest problem is not sensitivity, the detector mentioned is extremely sensitivity, but being able to separate the signal of a gravity wave from the noise of earth's normal vibrations. To create a large amplitude gravity wave, one needs a huge event to happen (colliding blackholes, supernova, etc) and it needs to be close enough that it's energy isn't absorbed by the matter between the source and us. The bad news is nothing has happened close by that would cause a big gravity wave since the experiments have been running, that is also the good news. -
-
Re: Lack of Gravity Waves
Thu, September 3, 2009 - 5:33 PMAt my school, the reaserch team that is involved with this matter, (measuring the gravitational waves, (when they will have actually done that, that is)), claims they can detect changes up to 10^-18m. Just this afternoon, I/we were talking, in class, with one of my professors, and he mentioned this - he said, "OK, an atom is about the magnitude of 10^-10/10^-11m, nucleus roughly 10^-15m, but what can you measure at 10^-18m?! (Well, these were not e-x-a-c-t-l-y his words, but you get the point he was trying to convey).
...
-
-
-
-